That said, Samsung does escape some of the competition in its higher capacities. The story continues into the 2TB capacity as well, with Adata showing its strength again with the XPG Gammix S11 Pro, which costs very little more than the 870 QVO but gets all the benefit of a PCIe 3.0 x 4 interface.
Qvo vs evom ssd plus#
Even Samsung’s own 970 EVO Plus NVMe SSD comes in with superior speeds at only a small uptick in price. The 1TB WD_Black SN750 can be found for the same price as Samsung’s 1TB model, and the 1TB Adata XPG SX8200 costs even less, but both offer read and write speeds that are several times faster than the 870 QVO. But, even a few competitors can spell trouble when they’re operating on a faster connection standard.Īt the 1TB and 2TB capacities, there are actually a number of PCIe NVMe SSDs that are priced to compete against the Samsung 870 QVO models, but they aren’t limited by the SATA III standard. It’s higher-capacity 870 QVO models offer a particularly enticing value, as few drives are evening offering 8TB capacities, and Samsung maintains a fairly low price per gigabyte.Įven a small drive like the 2TB model has few competitors that deliver that much storage for $249. The competitionĪs far as the SATA SSD market goes, Samsung is in a fairly strong position. Samsung backs the 870 QVO with a three year warranty and rates the drive with an endurance of 0.33 drive writes per per day (that’s 720TB in total), which is similar to the 860 QVO. However, the speeds available fall well below what’s possible on affordable PCIe NVMe SSDs, which are becoming more and more affordable even at high capacities. These are impressive speeds for a SATA SSD, as they’re nearly at the limit of what’s possible on a now-dated connector.
Qvo vs evom ssd windows#
1GB files transfer to and from the drive so fast Windows can’t even bring up the transfer countdown, and games loaded onto the SSD launch and load without noticeable delay.
Qvo vs evom ssd zip#
While these benchmark numbers may tell one story for users with high-level demands, the reality is that we find the 870 QVO to zip along in general use.
However, our testing showed the 2TB drive lagging behind those figures, with an average of 10,167 IOPS in random reads and 30,296 IOPS in random writes. Samsung has also improved the random read and write (QD1) speeds, which are now rated at 11K IOPS (a 13% improvement on the 860 QVO) and 35K IOPS, respectively. In fact, we’ve seen the drive come out slightly ahead of Samsung’s estimates in tests on multiple systems (a Chuwi GBox and a personal rig) for sequential read and write speeds, albeit only by 1MBps.
With over 500GB piled onto our 2TB drive, we haven’t seen that write-speed slowdown take place yet. In other words, once the drive reaches a certain capacity, Intelligent TurboWrite will not work and sequential write performance can fall to as low as 80MBps for the 1TB model and 160MBps for the bigger capacities. Here’s how the Samsung SSD 870 QVO performed in our suite of benchmark tests:ĬrystalDiskMark: 561.12MBps (read) 530.2MBps (write)Ītto: 537MBps (read, 256mb) 509MBps (write, 256mb)ĪS SSD: 502.25MBps (seq read) 483.7MBps (seq write)
0 kommentar(er)
